Executive Summary
Written by Conveo

Executive Summary

This shopalong study reveals that protein bar shopping is far less exploratory than it may appear on shelf. For most shoppers, the trip begins with habit already in motion: they enter familiar stores, often on routine grocery runs, with established nutritional goals, a shortlist of trusted brands, and a strong preference for efficient decision-making. In that context, the winning brands are not simply the loudest—they are the ones that make fit instantly obvious. Shoppers want to know, at a glance, whether a bar delivers on protein, sugar, taste, and value. That means shelf organization and packaging work best when they reduce friction rather than create theater.

At shelf, shoppers are generally able to find the protein bar section, but that should not be mistaken for a frictionless experience. What catches attention first is usually a combination of clean organization, recognizable branding, bright packaging, and sale tags—not immersive displays. The deeper point is that attention and conversion are not the same thing. Promotions can interrupt the routine, but final choice is still driven primarily by nutritional content, flavor, and prior trust. This creates a clear implication for Ferrero: Power Crunch has a meaningful opening, but growth depends on making its distinctive wafer texture and taste more visible while more clearly signaling why it deserves a place in a nutrition-led set. Today, the brand faces a conversion gap driven by inconsistent visibility, limited awareness, and an efficacy story that does not always feel as strong as competitors with more prominent protein claims.

Number of interviews started

39

Number of interviews completed

25

Average duration of interviews

31 minutes

Study Demographics

This study reflects a U.S.-only shopper sample, with all 25 completed interviews conducted in 🇺🇸 United States. The participant mix skews female, with 15 women and 10 men represented. Age distribution leans toward midlife shoppers, with the largest cohorts in ages 35–44 (8 participants) and 45–54 (7 participants), followed by 55–64 (5), 25–34 (3), and 65+ (2).

Behaviorally, this is a highly relevant sample for routine protein bar purchasing: supermarket shopping dominates the purchase journey, though many participants also buy bars across convenience, gas, health food, and club channels. Most participants described regular grocery rhythms—typically weekly or twice-weekly—and protein bar purchases were overwhelmingly planned rather than impulsive. In other words, this audience is not casually browsing the category; they are repeat shoppers making purposeful trade-offs.

Key Findings

1. The protein bar trip starts before the shelf: routine, familiarity, and nutritional intent shape the decision

Protein bar shopping begins with a mental filter already in place. Most participants were not entering the store to “see what’s out there”; they were folding protein bars into a larger grocery routine and using familiar stores because those environments feel predictable, efficient, and aligned to their needs. As one shopper put it, “I happen to like the Kroger rewards program and the fuel points more. And I'm happy with the selection and the cleanliness of this store.” That combination of convenience, store trust, and repeat behavior means brands are often competing inside a narrow consideration set, not an open marketplace.

2. Shelf visibility matters most when it simplifies the category, not when it overwhelms it

Once shoppers reach the shelf, organization does a great deal of the selling. Most reported that the category was easy to navigate when products were grouped logically by brand and placed at visible levels. Bright colors and sale tags helped interrupt the visual field, but elaborate displays were notably less influential than simple, functional cues. One participant summarized the category well: “The shelf is very well organized... It’s very easy for me to find what I’m looking for.”

3. The category is easy to enter—but not always easy to shop well

Although most participants described the protein bar shelf as easy or very easy to navigate, the research also surfaces a more practical layer of friction: shoppers are often navigating around retail execution problems rather than category confusion. Out-of-stocks, scattered assortment, lower-shelf placement, and the challenge of comparing bars across nutritional needs all undermine confidence. One shopper captured this tension clearly: “The only thing that I've noticed sometimes at this store is that they are out of stock of a bar that I might want.”

4. Power Crunch has permission to play—but not yet a strong enough reason to win habitually

Power Crunch is not facing a pure taste problem. In fact, shoppers who know the brand often describe its wafer texture and treat-like profile as a meaningful positive. One shopper said, “I actually enjoyed that better instead of that gritty protein taste.” The issue is that this advantage is not consistently legible at shelf, nor is it always paired with a nutrition story strong enough to compete with bars making bigger protein claims. Trial exists, but regular purchase is limited, and the brand is too often held back by low awareness, availability issues, muted packaging communication, and concern that it may not deliver the same functional payoff as alternatives.

Recommended follow-up studies

To build on these findings, Ferrero would benefit from a next wave of research that moves from broad path-to-purchase understanding into sharper optimization decisions. The current study makes clear that the opportunity is not just to “stand out,” but to stand out in ways that feel relevant to routine, nutrition-led shoppers. That means future work should focus on clarifying the right shelf, pack, and messaging interventions to improve conversion.

  1. Power Crunch Packaging Optimization Study — Test alternative front-of-pack designs that more clearly communicate wafer texture, protein content, sugar credentials, and functional benefits to understand which cues drive strongest purchase intent.
  2. Shelf Visibility and Merchandising Experiment — Evaluate how eye-level placement, shelf blockers, price tags, and retailer-specific POS executions affect noticeability and choice for Power Crunch versus key competitors.
  3. Need-State Segmentation Deep Dive — Explore differences between shoppers buying for meal replacement, workout recovery, indulgent snacking, family use, or on-the-go convenience to determine where Power Crunch has the strongest right to win.
  4. Trial-to-Repeat Conversion Study — Follow recent triers and lapsed buyers over time to understand what moves Power Crunch from one-time curiosity into repeat purchase, with particular attention to availability, pricing, flavor expectations, and nutrition trade-offs.